Friday, November 20, 2009

Dairyland Greyhound Park Is Closing

Dairyland Greyhound Park in Kenosha, WI, is closing its doors on December 31, 2009 after almost 20 years. And along with the 180 jobs that will be lost, as many as 900 greyhounds will find themselves suddenly homeless.
Dogs who do not find new homes, foster homes, or are not filtered out to various rescue groups will be euthanized.

Probably the biggest myth about retired racing greyhounds, and indeed greyhounds in general, is that they need lots of exercise, a big yard, and are high-energy dogs. I was surprised to learn that this is not true at all! Actually retired racers are pretty lazy; on average they spend 18 hours a day sleeping.Greyhounds are sprinters, not marathoners. They need a decent walk everyday, much like any dog, and the ability to run freely in a fenced environment occasionally. They also need a warm, soft place to while away most of their time.

Greyhounds are generally anywhere from 40-100 pounds, and because there are so many retired racers available it would be fairly easy to find a dog who would be a good match for your lifestyle. Contrary to popular belief, having a greyhound in an apartment in the city is perfectly acceptable as long as you have time to walk it (again, like any dog!). There are plenty of available dogs who are good with kids, cats, and other dogs. All adoptable greyhounds at Dairyland are up-to-date on vaccinations and undergo a health examination by a veterinarian. They are also spayed or neutered before going to their new home.
Unlike many purebred dogs, racing greyhounds don't have inherited health problems, such as hip dysplasia. They require little grooming and are quiet, gentle, and easily adaptable animals. They also have a pretty long lifespan for a dog of their size - usually about 12 years.

If you are interesting in adopting or fostering a Dairyland retired racing greyhound, or if you just want to learn more, please contact Joanne Kehoe, Operations Director at 312-559-0887 or Dairyland Race Track Adoption Center at 262-612-8256. You'd be saving a life!

Please pass this message on to anyone you think might be willing to help give these loving dogs a chance at a good life. They deserve it.



Thursday, September 24, 2009

The Shelter Pet Project

Today The Humane Society of the United States is launching is largest-ever ad campaign, The Shelter Pet Project, to promote shelter adoption in the U.S. With two commercials, one airing tonight on Animal Planet, focusing on the positive aspects of shelter adoption, the hope is to end the common misconception that there is something wrong with or undesirable about pets who come from a shelter.The fact is, shelter animals make wonderful pets. They are loyal, well socialized, loving, and oftentimes less expensive and less work than animals from pet stores and breeders. They are all spayed or neutered, updated on vaccines, treated for health and behavioral issues, socialized with other animals in the shelter, and nowadays many are even micro chipped - all before setting one paw on the adoption floor. That is A LOT of money saved in vet bills and a lot of time and effort saved by new owners!

Many people seem to think that if an animal is at a shelter it's because it has a behavioral problem, is not housebroken, or has expensive health issues. That could not be further from the truth. Most animals who end up at shelters are not there through any fault of their own. Things like divorce, financial hardship, allergies or a move can land the most devoted and well-behaved pets in a shelter.Another myth about shelter animals is that you cannot find a purebred at a shelter. Actually, one in four dogs living in shelters are purebred. There are also tons of animal rescue groups who focus on finding homes for specific breeds of dogs and cats. However, it's my personal belief and a common belief held among animal workers that mixed breeds have all the advantages of purebred animals and fewer of the problems associated with various pure breeds. It's more important to choose the individual dog or cat than to choose based on a particular breed; there is no guarantee that the animal you end up with when choosing on breed alone will have the qualities you admire about their pedigree.

I think The Shelter Project is a great way to spread the word about the positive aspects of adopting from shelters. There are so many benefits and much fewer risks. If just 20% of people who welcome new pets into their homes each year adopt from shelters, it would save over 3 million healthy dogs and cats from euthanasia.

Please help spread the word about adopting homeless pets from shelters. Through The Shelter Project you can send an Adopt-A-Gram to friends and family urging them to adopt their next furry friend from a shelter. You can go here, then click Adopt-A-Gram at the bottom of the page to send yours today!

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Mah Baybees


Sappho
Rawr.


ArloWhaddaya mean this isn't my bed??


Ella
Dis where I hide mah Twinkies.


Sappho
I can has some privacy here, Dad? Sheesh!




Friday, September 4, 2009

FIV+ Cats

Plenty of cats living in shelters throughout America were brought in as strays. Which usually means that they are not fixed and not vaccinated. Many of these cats test positive for FIV, or feline immunodeficiency virus. If that sounds familiar it may be because this retrovirus has a similar name to the human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, which is the cause of AIDS in humans.

Now, there's good news and bad news for cats living with FIV.

The bad news is that it slowly kills off their immune systems, leaving them susceptible to all manner if illnesses that could cause death. They are also some of the most difficult cats to find homes for, as many people do not understand FIV or are unwilling to take on the responsibility of having a cat with the virus.

The good news is that cats living with FIV are often healthy, happy animals. FIV is passed only between cats (which means you cannot catch FIV or HIV from your cat, neither can you give the viruses to a feline). It is actually quite a difficult virus to transfer. FIV can be passed through blood transfusions, severe oral infections, or deep puncture wounds (most often betwen outdoor unneutered male cats, who are more prone to fighting). So things like playing, cleaning, and eating & drinking from the same dishes cannot transfer FIV from one cat to another. Also good news: cats can live years and years without complications from FIV. Yes, it is important that you have a vet who is up-to-date about current FIV practices. It is also important that you keep FIV+ cats indoors, both to keep them from spreading the virus and to protect their weakened immune systems. Lastly, FIV+ cats should be kept updated on vaccinations and fed a good quality diet.

My point is that there are SO MANY wonderful kitties waiting in shelters for the home that will never find them. And there's just no reason why they shouldn't be welcomed into the lives of people looking for a new cat, especially if the people don't already have a cat. When kept indoors and monitored closely, FIV+ cats are like any other feline companion: fun, loving, and full of personality.

And now, because I think this is a great little fact sheet from Best Friends:

FIV Facts

1. The Feline Immuno-deficiency Virus is a slow virus that affects a cat's immune system over a period of years.

2. FIV is a cat-only disease and cannot be spread to humans or other non-felines.


3. FIV cats most often live long, healthy, and relatively normal lives with no symptoms at all.


4. FIV is not easily passed between cats. It cannot be spread casually - like in litter boxes, water and food bowls, or when snuggling and playing. It is rarely spread from a mother to her kittens.


5. The virus can be spread through blood transfusions, badly infected gums, or serious, penetrating bite wounds. (Bite wounds of this kind are extremely rare, except in free-roaming, unneutered tomcats.)


6. A neutered cat, in a home, is extremely unlikely to infect other cats, if properly introduced.


7. Many vets are not educated about FIV since the virus was only discovered 15 years ago.


8. FIV-positive cats should be kept as healthy as possible. Keep them indoors and free from stress, feed them a high-quality diet, keep and treat any secondary problems as soon as they arise.

Friday, August 14, 2009

The Newest Philadelphia Eagle: Michael Vick

Michael Vick has signed on to be part of the NFL's Philadelphia Eagles. He is expected to be fully reinstated to the game by week six of the season, which is in October.

"I fully understand that playing football in the NFL is a privilege, not a right, and I am truly thankful for [the] opportunity I have been given," Vick said in a statement last month upon his reinstatement [to the NFL].

"As you can imagine, the last two years have given me time to re-evaluate my life, mature as an individual and fully understand the terrible mistakes I made in the past and what type of life I must lead moving forward," he said in last month's statement.

Vick is also aiding the Humane Society of the United States in their effort to eradicate dog fighting and animal cruelty by sharing his story with at-risk youth.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Petland Employee Drowns Injured Rabbits

I'm sorry to post this violent and disturbing photo. I know it's not something anyone wants to see, at least not any sane people, but I think it's important that people witness exactly what happened to these two rabbits at the hands of Elizabeth Carlisle, a Petland employee in Akron, Ohio.


After being allowed to "attack" and "eat" one another, Carlisle decided to drown the rabbits rather than seek veterinary attention or even humane euthanasia. The rabbits had sustained many deep wounds, a missing eye, what appeared to Petland employees to be a broken jaw, and possible paralysis from the waist down after fighting each other. These are not injuries that happened in the course of a few minutes. With proper supervision and care, they could have been prevented altogether.

Carlisle admits to a friend on Facebook that "[T]he manager took the pic for me. [S]he reminded me that there were people outside as [I] was swearing at them to just hurry up and die but then she was so kind as to take this picture."

This is not the first time allegations of cruelty and irresponsibility have been brought against Petland.

In a statement released on August 4, Petland says that Elizabeth Carlisle was "immediately dismissed" from her position at Petland upon their discovery of her heinous acts of cruelty and that "the case is now being handled by local law enforcement." Good. I was wondering when law enforcement was planning to get involved because HELLO! I smell a giant lawsuit and hopefully some jail time coming Ms. Carlisle's way. Jesus, something better be done about Carlisle's actions, as well as whomever else was involved, other than losing their jobs. The type of person who would drown injured rabbits, yell and swear at them to die faster, and then pose for a disgusting photo with them after they are dead has issues we should all be concerned about. As I've said before, people with a history of abusing others often start with abusing animals.

Please join me in writing to Petland President Frank Difatta to request that Petland stores no longer sell rabbits. After demonstrating their gross inability to provide even the most minimal care and protection for rabbits, they should not continue to accept responsibility for their wellbeing. I honestly don't think Petland should be allowed to sell animals at all if they are not going to care for them properly and make sure their employees are not psychopaths.

PETA's letter to Petland can be found here.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Would you like to touch my whale?


And no, that's not a euphemism for something dirty.

If you happen to have 200 extra bucks lying around, Chicago's Shedd Aquarium now offers visitors the opportunity to touch a beluga whale. Pretty exciting, even if it does cost a small fortune. Included in the $200 price tag is an orientation on animal care, a private meeting with the whale, some touchy time, and maybe a tongue scratching or the chance to hear the whale's heartbeat. At the end of the experience you get a souvenir photo with your new friend. And the chance to tell people that you TOUCHED A WHALE! Aaaaagh!

I think this is a really cool idea, but I wonder if it stresses out the whales? I don't know much about the temperament of belugas, but I can imagine that it might be confusing and stressful to have strangers grabbing at you two days a week (the face-to-face interaction is only available on Fridays and Saturdays). Then again, maybe it's nice to have some new company after seeing the same trainers day in and day out. Who knows?

Anyway, this is a pretty unique attraction and thought I'd share!

Friday, July 17, 2009

Hello again, let's talk about something depressing!

Why, hello! I have a blog! About animals! Right.

Sorry for my long absence, it's been a hectic few weeks. But I'm back! And sad to say that today's discussion is about puppy mills. Sigh. I look forward to the day when I don't have to think about puppy mills anymore because they no longer exist...

Anyway.

I am on a bunch of animal welfare-related email lists and I must say that between the attention puppy mills are getting among animal activists groups and the rising number of mainstream media reports on them (and the busts!) I am hopeful we can get some more legislation involved in the regulation of dog breeding. I mean, puppy mills are B-A-D. They are filthy, disgusting, inhumane, cramped, and often the dogs are sick and not vaccinated. Which, as a consumer - even if you don't particularly care about puppy mills - you should be pissed off about.

Have you ever bought a puppy from a pet store? If so, how was your dog's health? Because often that is how puppy mills come to light: after angry customers report buying sick puppies from an organization and after further investigation it becomes apparent that said puppies were born and raised in disgusting conditions with inadequate veterinary care for the parent dogs and the puppies. Wow, run-on sentence much? But really, it makes me so mad!

Defenseless animals are completely vulnerable to whatever kind of care we humans are willing to provide. And keeping the parent dogs in squalid conditions is bound to have ill effects on their offspring (which are then purchased for hundreds or even thousands of dollars by unsuspecting people who want a [healthy, duh] family pet). I know the last dogs my family bought from a pet store (yes, I KNOW, bad Austin!, but I was in 6th grade and didn't know better yet, I promise) were VERY sick. They were sister lab-dalmatian mixes and had worms so bad that when they shat it was nothing but a squirming pile of white parasites. Gross, no? We had no proof they came from a puppy mill, but it was obvious that their care had been lacking until they came to us. But don't worry, they both recovered after some medical attention and grew into happy, loving dogs.

Also for the consumer to think about is what ELSE the people who are running puppy mills have their fingers in. Are you inadvertently supporting puppy mills by buying, say, organic milk? Also, if an organization (or farmer, in this case) thinks it is okay to run a puppy mill, what do they think is okay to do with the milk you are buying? In my opinion, being an irresponsible producer is not often concentrated on just one product if you know what I'm saying.

It's come out in recent months that a puppy mill in Lancaster County, Pa., called B&R Puppies, also supplies organic milk to Horizon Organics, a popular brand found anywhere from Jewel-Osco to Dominick's to Whole Foods Market. And if you know anything about Whole Foods (I can't speak for the others) you know that animal welfare is of the utmost importance to them. Here is an update on the Newsweek article "A (Designer) Dog's Life", which solicited a wonderfully supportive response from Horizon Organics. Upon receiving word that Newsweek was about to publicly announce that Horizon buys milk from a puppy mill farm, they immediately sent out an inspector who reported that dogs were indeed being kept in filth. Horizon suspended the farmer, John Stoltzfus, at the urging of Whole Foods. Stoltzfus has since stopped his puppy mill and has begun supplying milk to Horizon again as of early July.

My point of telling you all this is that WE HAVE THE POWER. I know it's cheesy, but as consumers we do have the power to choose which organizations to support. Part of that power is knowing when to lean harder on an organization in order to stop terrible things from happening, like the continuation of puppy mills. If you suspect that puppy mills are behind the scenes at a store you love, write them a letter. Get a petition started. Get the media involved (that'll scare 'em). Demand that they stop their relationship with sources who condone inhumane treatment of animals. It can be done; just look at Whole Foods Market.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

All you ever wanted to know about eggs, and then some

Chickens are arguably the most abused animals in the agricultural business. Currently the Humane Society of the United States is trying to ban the use of battery wire cages, which give hens less space than a single sheet of letter-size paper. Confined their whole lives in these cages, the hens can't spread their wings, dust clean themselves, nest, forage or perch, all of which are the natural behaviors of these birds. California passed Prop 2 (the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act) with an overwhelming 63% in 2008, which outlaws the use of battery cages for chickens, gestation crates for pigs, and veal crates for calves.

If you grocery shop for yourself or your family then you know what I'm talking about when I refer to the four frillion different labels on egg cartons. Organic, Cage-free, Free-Range, Hormone & Antibiotic-Free, on and on and on. But what do those labels really mean? And why is it important to know the difference?

Let me start by answering the latter question. It is important to know the difference, for instance, between Cage-Free and Free-Range; a significant distinction is that Cage-Free hens are kept in barns or warehouses without access to the outdoors, while Free-Range hens are also kept in barns or warehouses, but have some access to the outdoors. However, neither has third-party auditing to make sure guidelines are being followed. The smallest word variation can mean quite a difference in the lives of the hens who supply your eggs.

From the perspective of animal welfare, none of the labels, save one, is 100% hen-friendly. Animal Welfare Approved eggs ensure that chickens are not kept in cages at all, are allowed unfettered access to the outdoors, and forced molting (by starvation) as well as beak cutting is prohibited. Unfortunately, as of yet there are no producers who sell Animal Welfare Approved eggs to grocery stores.

A complete list of what those confusing labels actually mean can be found here. You might be surprised at what you discover about the origins of your favorite breakfast food.

Now the United Egg Producers (UEP), our nations largest trade organization for eggs, has put out cartoons depicting chickens wishing they'd never been taken out of their cages to try and make kids think that a caged lifestyle is preferable to a free one. And since I can't get my computer to cooperate, you can see the cartoons here. Please go look. They will infuriate you.

It seems the battle to end animal cruelty is constant and always uphill. But we carry on because otherwise millions of animals each year continue to live, suffer, and die in horrible conditions. And honestly? They deserve better than that.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Should the military use animals in training medics?


New videos have surfaced depicting the use of monkeys and goats in military medical training. Acquired by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, now the videos are causing controversy about whether the military is violating its own regulations regarding animal welfare.

Similar to the question about whether using live animals for vet school training is ethical, the debate is strong over whether using live animals in medical training in the military is acceptable. Some say it's essential and invaluable; others argue that it's a poor substitute for actual human experience and that it's inhumane treatment of the animals. In the CNN article I link to above, one doctor argues that no animal has ever died from their experiments so it's okay to conduct them. But I ask this: how much do they suffer? How often are they allowed to recover only to be used again in some other test? What kind of life is that?

While I have the utmost respect for our service men and women and want to ensure their health and safety out in the field, I don't believe that testing nerve agents on monkeys or learning how to put a chest tube in a goat is particularly pertinent practice for military medics. Animal anatomy - even monkey anatomy - is pretty different from human anatomy. How a monkey reacts to the nerve agent might be totally different from how a human would react; I can't imagine the chest of a goat is so similar to a human that it would be devastating to a person's education to miss that day in medical school.

I believe that military medics should do rounds with doctors in hospitals, in trauma centers, where they will have the opportunity to experience real human medical problems and crises and will learn how to deal with them. I imagine this next suggestion might be considered too resource-consuming or impractical, but perhaps medics-in-training might be assigned to an active-duty medic and follow him or her on a tour in order to get some hands-on experience.

Not only am I an advocate for animal welfare and the humane treatment of animals, I also want our military medical staff to receive the best training possible. I do not think that the best training available requires animal involvement. Find another way, a better way, not only for the animals, but because using them just isn't a good substitute for the real thing.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Chicago is a rock star!


Not to toot my own horn or anything, but MY CITY is doing some amazing stuff with animal welfare.

A study went underway in May here in Chicago that, when complete, should give some concrete information about what the problems associated with homeless or at-risk pets, what neighborhoods in the city are most at-risk for animal abuse and neglect, how much companion animal issues cost the city. Because it's the first study of its kind, it is unclear what type or how much information will actually be useful, but researchers are collecting as much information as they can. The study will conclude by the end of this year with a report to the Chicago city council on its findings. More on the study as news unfolds.

*****

In other happy and Huzzah Chicago! news, a bill that would mandate a cross-reference of animal and child abuse has passed both houses of the Illinois legislature and is now awaiting Gov. Pat Quinn's signature to be signed into law. This bill could be instrumental in decreasing violence toward children and animals Chicago.

Basically, when a call of child abuse comes in, officers will be required to check to make sure that the same family has not also had reports of animal abuse, and vice versa. It is well documented that there is a significant connection between animal abuse and child abuse. In approximately 9 out of 10 households where children were abused, a 1983 study found that animals were also abused.

I'd like to encourage all you folks in the Chicagoland area to contact Gov. Quinn and ask him (nicely and respectfully 'cause we're all good people around these parts) to please sign this bill into law. And also give yourself a pat on the back, 'cause your town is the shit.

Monday, June 1, 2009

All I want for Christmas


Go watch this video of Kingsford the piglet.

AWWWWWW. My heart feels all squishy looking at this. He's even litter-box trained!

Friday, May 22, 2009

Grudgingly, I'm going to give Vick a chance

As you've probably guessed, I am no fan of Michael Vick's. Vick was released from prison this week to serve the rest of his 23-month sentence for dogfighting on house arrest in Virginia. He will work a $10 per hour construction job during this time.

Wayne Pacelle, President and CEO of the Humane Society of the United States, visited Vick in prison (at Vick's request) before his release. Vick claims that he has been traumatized by his experience and that he is a changed man. He asked Pacelle to allow him to help in the HSUS's effort to end dogfighting, which is most prevalent among young black men in urban areas.

Now, admittedly, this guy has been punished for his crimes: almost two years in prison, expulsion from the NFL, the loss of all his endorsements, and bankruptcy. It is still up in the air as to whether Vick will ever play football professionally again. There is a part of me that hopes Vick will not be welcomed back into the NFL, but I think it's just a petulant part that is not going to let go of what's happened until Vick demonstrates that his commitment to end dogfighting is real and not a ploy to win back public favor.

When you look at this from a positive perspective, as Pacelle points out on the HSUS blog, Vick's willingness to help end dogfighting could be really valuable. He can tell his story and talk about what he has learned from his experience. Hopefully some of his celebrity will go to a good cause and he will be able to reach out to young men who think dogfighting is cool or acceptable. Perhaps he can lead by word and example.

I hope Michael Vick realizes what an impact he can have, and that he uses his influence to better our society. For now, call me cautiously optimistic and keep your fingers crossed.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Chicago: New Five Dog Limit?

Alderman Ray Suarez (31st) introduced a city ordinance at yesterday's council meeting that would limit the number of dogs Chicago households are allowed to have to five. Suarez said that a 27/50 majority have already communicated support for this ordinance.

Due in large part to the problem of people not picking up their dogs' feces and allowing it to stink up their - and their unappreciative neighbors' - yards, Suarez hopes the ordinance (if passed) will allow all people to enjoy their yards stink-free.

The ordinance will be debated by the council's License committee, but a date for that has not been set. It will be a public hearing, so if you have strong opinions on this matter you should plan to attend.

As for me, I think this ordinance will be mostly useless if passed. I mean, first and foremost, how are they going to enforce it? And why do I want them to take time to enforce how many dogs my neighbor has pooping in his backyard when that takes away from other, more important, laws they could be enforcing?

Also, I don't love the idea of the government telling me how many pets I can have. We have animal cruelty laws in place (though I do think those could be stepped up in severity) so that if people are neglectful of cleaning their pets' living areas properly there are penalties. Perhaps the focus should be on amending the laws already in place, rather than adding new ones that will be hard to enforce and which restrict peoples' freedom.

I mean, if I had six dogs I'd make sure their poop was cleaned up.

Monday, May 11, 2009

Chewcifer


My dog was a beast this weekend. I was away for Mothers' Day, but every time my husband turned his back (and sometimes in plain view!) Arlo was destroying some contraband household item.

We adopted Arlo from the SPCA in Charlottesville, VA, when he was eight months old. Back then, he chewed the occasional shoe and that was it. We thought to ourselves "Man, did we get lucky!" and kept our shoes well-hidden (mostly).

Now he is two and it's like anything within reach is up for grabs. We have definitely been downgraded in the behavior department.

He chews tissues, dryer sheets, my (ahem) personal products, pens, socks, shoes, cardboard, feather dusters, dish towels and the list goes on and on. Nothing is too gross, too hard, too potentially dangerous for my dog's little jaws.

Short of keeping our apartment pristine at all times (ha!) we aren't quite sure how to handle this situation. We scold, we rub his nose in whatever he's shredded, we glare, we even resorted to crating him yesterday while we were up at my mom's in the suburbs.

We super-duper-really-a-lot do not want to go back to crating Arlo. He has some separation anxiety issues that make that a not-so-great idea and we were thrilled when he seemed to do well out of the crate. Mostly he sleeps when we are gone. We lock up our bedroom and closets and give him free reign of the kitchen, living room, and bathroom. For about four months now it's been easy livin'.

Now we are never sure what we'll find decimated when we get home from work and school.

As I said, we would really rather not go back to crating Arlo. We are gone long enough during the day that if we can avoid that at all, we will. So now I'm asking: Do you have any advice for young pup parents whose dog has turned into Chewcifer?

Friday, May 8, 2009

This Just Isn't Enough

On May 1 Minnesota dog breeder and owner of Pick of the Litter, Inc. Kathy Bauck was sentenced to 20 days in jail, a $500 fine and was ordered to allow Humane Society inspectors access to her breeding facilities for drop-in inspections. She was also sentenced to probation and community service. Bauck was convicted in April of four misdemeanor counts of animal cruelty. The two felony animal cruelty charges were dismissed by the jury.

Oh yeah. Did I mention that this woman is notorious for performing veterinary services (surgeries, vaccinations) without ever having been to vet school? And that she has numerous citations for animal cruelty and animal torture?

If you can believe it, the state of Minnesota is allowing her to keep all her dogs.

Um, excuse me?!

I thought that dropping the felony charges and letting her off without much jail time or heavy enough (in my opinion) fines was bad. But this...I feel like the very FIRST punishment should have been to order Ms. Bauck not to have access to any companion animal ever again!

If you have the stomach for it, you can watch a video of the abuse Bauck inflicted here.

I think I am too mad to write more about this now. What are your thoughts?

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Good News for Canada's Harp Seals!


Each year on the east coast of Canada, a terrible slaughter takes place. Focused mainly on harp seals but also including some hooded seals, hundreds of thousands of animals are clubbed or shot before being skinned; their white spotted fur is valuable in many countries.

Sealers are generally fisherman who take part in the hunt during the fishing off-season. Killing seals brings in approximately one twentieth of their annual income, with the rest being made up by commercial fishing. Still, the Canadian government subsidizes this unnecessary hunt, which was declared inhumane after veterinarians studied it in 2001. Most of the animals killed are baby seals under three months of age, and too often they are not dead before being skinned. Many are shot from a distance and fall under the ice to die slowly, lost before the hunters can even harvest their fur.

The good news: today we've reached a milestone in our efforts to end these horrible seal hunts. European Parliament voted overwhelmingly to ban the import and sale of furs from commercially harvested seals. The U.S. and Mexico already have a ban on importing most seal fur products and Russia just made it illegal to hunt seals under one year of age in the White Sea in March 2009. However, Europe's ban does not cover the seals hunted by the Inuits and other indigenous tribes from the north, who kill them as a source of sustenance.

Canadian minister of trade Stockwell Day has said that if Europe doesn't exempt Canada from the ban they will challenge their decision at the World Trade Organization.

We'll see what happens, but ultimately this is a huge step forward in protecting Canada's seal population!

Major Setback for Our Nation's Wolves



Remember when I told you about the gray wolf being kicked off the Endangered Species list? And we signed that petition urging Ken Salazar to reconsider this problematic decision?

Well, he didn't. And they were.

Beginning May 4, it's open season on gray wolves in the Northern Rockies. All but 300 of the 1,300 wolves in Montana and Idaho can be legally killed and Idaho - which is home to the majority of the U.S.'s gray wolves - has already declared its intent to kill more than half of its wolf population within the year. The Northern Rockies is thought to have about 1,600 wolves total in the region.

After we spent so much time (over 30 years!), energy and [government] money on reviving the gray wolf species, what sense does it make to turn around and sign legislation allowing their population to be immediately decimated?

Why, none of course.

Defenders of Wildlife plan to sue Salazar as soon as possible.

Friday, May 1, 2009

Is Swine Flu a Danger to My Pet?

So far there's been no indication that dogs and cats are at risk of contracting swine flu.

The new A/H1N1 virus is currently being studied to determine its origin and little is known about it. However, it doesn't seem that cats and dogs are catching it. If you have a potbellied pig or other types of pigs, you should closely monitor their health. If they begin showing signs of health issues, take them to the vet right away. There are vaccines for the Influenza A virus, which is a common cause of respiratory disease in swine all over the world.

And just some fun facts I've gathered:

*You cannot get swine flu from eating pork product. Bacon lovers, live on.

*Not a pig in the U.S. has been reported to have swine flu.

*Swine flu thus far has been passed person-to-person only.

*The 2009 H1N1 flu virus consists of North American swine influenza viruses, North American avian influenza viruses, human influenza viruses and swine influenza viruses found in both Asia and Europe.

*People are contagious as long as they are symptomatic and for about 7 days afterward. Younger children could be contagious longer. Cover your mouth when you cough/sneeze and wash your hands a ton. I'm carrying hand sanitizer since I ride public transportation everywhere. Stay home if you're sick.


If you want more information on people & swine flu, you can check out what the CDC has to say. If you want more information on how this will affect animals, you can click here to get to the American Veterinary Medical Association's take on the situation.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Coyotes Are Not Dogs


If you know me, I'm sure I've mentioned The Daily Coyote to you. It's this great website where author/photographer Shreve Stockton narrates her experiences raising a wild coyote, Charlie, in rural Wyoming. He was brought to her before his eyes even opened after his parents were shot and killed. Shreve took him in because the alternative for Charlie was death. She posts a new photo of Charlie every day on her site.

Shreve writes from home and lives in a tiny cabin in the middle of the woods. Her lifestyle allows her to spend lots of time, money and energy on making sure that Charlie has a good life, a life that is safe for him and one that keeps other people safe from him. Shreve's opinion on raising a coyote can be found here, and anyone considering the idea should read this and do a ton of research before taking on a wild animal.

Because that is what a coyote is: a wild animal.

Dogs and cats and other domesticated animals have been bred for centuries to trust humans, to be passive, to be trainable, to be companions. Coyotes have not. While coyotes are not inherently aggressive or mean animals (don't want to give them a bad rep here), they are unpredictable. They can turn on you without warning, just like any wild animal, and you might not see if coming.

Also, coyotes don't trust easily. They are shy animals by nature. Shreve addresses this on her website and in her book; she and one friend are the only people Charlie feels comfortable with, which means no visitors, no extended vacations. She can't endanger other people by having them to her home and making Charlie feel threatened and she can't leave him with just anyone because he only trusts two people in the world.

On the legal side of things, you often need a permit to keep a wild animal in your home. In Illinois, my home state, the state legally owns all wildlife, and coyotes are protected as furbearers. If you are not in Illinois, you can look up your state's laws on harboring a wild animal here, as well as what to do if you have nuisance wildlife you want removed; in some states (like Illinois) you need a permit for removal from your property.

Please, please if you find a coyote or any other wild animal, contact a wildlife rehabilitation center for help. Do not try to raise a wild animal on your own. The best, kindest thing you can do for either of you is to turn it over to experts who will help it as necessary and nurture it appropriately, with the ultimate goal being a safe reintroduction to its natural habitat.

Monday, April 27, 2009

A Step Toward Ending Terminal Surgeries in Vet Schools


Oklahoma State University vet student Sarah Gordon has made a great stride in stopping terminal surgeries at her school. In the past, students whose ethics prevented them from being able to participate in terminal surgeries, or surgeries performed on healthy animals who are then euthanized rather than allowed to recover, had been given an alternative option.

During Sarah's second year at OSU, the alternative program fell through. She petitioned the school to come up with other alternatives, soliciting support from the Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights (AVAR), an organization that has since been incorporated into the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association (HSVMA). Before the start of her third year, OSU implemented a program that used procedure-based surgeries on cadavers as well as extra surgical and anesthesia rotations.

The ethical dilemma of terminal surgeries in vet school training has been highlighted recently by Madeleine Picken's announcement that she would not donate the $5 million previously slotted to go to the OSU vet program because of animal treatment she described as "barbaric". After OSU's announcement on April 21 that they will no longer euthanize healthy animals in vet labs, Pickens retracted her refusal and the donation will now proceed as planned. Also good news: the school will no longer work with Class B dealers, who buy animals from kill shelters and resell them for medical testing.

I am having my own personal dance party over this news. Congratulations to Sarah Gordon and to OSU for taking a strong ethical stand on this issue and forging a path toward humane treatment of animals in vet schools!

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Supreme Court to Examine Depictions of Animal Cruelty Law

This fall, the Supreme Court will review a case where the Depiction of Animal Cruelty Act was struck down.

In 2005 Robert J. Stevens (this guy is super gross) was convicted and sentenced to three years in prison for creating and selling videos which depicted dog fights and dogs brutally mauling and killing helpless animals. Last year the Pennsylvania court of appeals overturned his conviction on the grounds that it violated his First Amendment right to free speech.

The Depiction of Animal Cruelty law was put into effect in 1999 in part because of the Humane Society of the United States' investigation into "crush videos", which depict scantily-clad women stomping on small animals such as kittens, puppies and rabbits with their bare feet or in high heels, killing them in a most gruesome manner. The videos are geared toward people with a sexual fetish for such cruelty.

The DAC law makes it illegal to produce, create, sell or purchase anything that portrays animal cruelty for no valuable purpose.

Since the overturning of the DAC law, "crush videos" are resurfacing in popularity and production, leading to thousands of helpless animals losing their lives.

I really hope the DAC law is re-instated. I can't think of a good reason why people should be allowed to profit from depictions of animal cruelty when all 50 states uphold some type of anti-cruelty law. And if you are creating, selling, or buying these types of videos you are either directly or indirectly participating in the illegal acts that had to take place to make them.

It's a fact that animal cruelty can often lead to cruelty toward humans. Why should these videos, which serve no purpose other than to excite & entertain disturbed people, be allowed to flourish in our society? Don't we have enough violence without protecting more needless cruelty?

Friday, April 17, 2009

I'm Tired of...ANIMAL CRUELTY


So I got this really awesome bracelet and I wanted to tell you guys about it.

It's from a website called I'm Tired of, which was created by a brother-sister team to help people support and get the word out about their favorite global issues. They have all sorts of causes, like I'm Tired of Cancer, I'm Tired of Global Warming, I'm Tired of World Hunger, I'm Tired of The Economy, and more. Of course, the one I'm sporting is I'm Tired of Animal Cruelty!

The great thing about these bracelets is that they are affordable, made from recycled materials right here in the U.S., and best of all, half of your money goes to support the cause of your choice.

Cool, huh?

The bracelets are $10 each and they are made of recycled tires and silver. For every bracelet you buy, $5 goes toward the charity connected with the cause of the bracelet you choose. Dan and Carrie, I'm Tired of's creators, do extensive research to make sure that the charity they choose to connect with each of their issues has a national or international presence. They also make sure they choose charities that put the majority of their donations toward solving issues or finding cures related to their cause.

For example, my $5 went to support Best Friends Animal Sanctuary. I was particularly happy about that because Best Friends is my favorite animal advocate group.

If you like this idea but Animal Cruelty isn't your absolute favorite cause (and why wouldn't it be??), you can purchase a bracelet for any of their other causes. If your cause isn't yet represented, there's a place at the bottom of the I'm Tired of homepage where you can vote for the next one to be added to the list.

Order yours today!

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Petition: "Howl" for the Wolves


As of April 2, the gray wolf has been taken off the Endangered Species list and in Idaho and Montana, this means that the killing of wolves - even newborn pups and nursing mothers - will be legal.

"Over the past year, the wolf population in Yellowstone National Park has declined by 27 percent, with more than 70 percent of wolf pups succumbing to disease," (NRDC's BioGems). After May 4, any wolves outside of national parks will be fair game for killing.

"According to a letter signed by some 230 scientists, a severe reduction in current wolf numbers would dramatically increase the threat of extinction for a gray wolf population that is still recovering. If you hand wolf management back to the states, more than 600 wolves could be caught in the crossfire," (NRDC's BioGems).

Currently wolves reside in only five percent of what was once their native range.

Please join me in signing this petition to encourage Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to reconsider this decision to kick the struggling gray wolf off the Endangered Species list.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Polar Bears: 1, Idiotic Woman: 0


A 32-year-old woman climbed a fence and went through prickly bushes surrounding the polar bear habitat at the Berlin Zoo in Germany on Friday, then jumped in during feeding time.

I think the question on everyone's mind is: What the hell was she thinking?

Unfortunately, no one knows. But reports say that she seemed elated at first as she swam toward the bears, only to have them bite her arms and legs. The woman was rescued with floating rings that rescuers used to hoist her out of the habitat. The rings were also used to distract the hungry bears from further mauling her. She remains in the hospital for treatment for her injuries.

I hope she learned her lesson. I also hope that anyone else thinking of launching themselves into the enclosed area of large, carnivorous predators at feeding time (or at all) will remember how that went down for this lady. I mean...just don't do it. Bears - or any wild animal, for that matter - are not your friends. Admire their cuteness from a distance if you value you life, limbs, and whether other people think you are sane.

For more photos of the woman in the polar bear habitat, including a video of her rescue, go here.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Let me see you shake YOUR tailfeather!




Please go here right now and watch this bird dance to Ray Charles.

I promise it will make your day better.

Doga: Yoga for You & Your Dog


A new trend is on the rise: doga, otherwise known as yoga for you and your dog.

All over America and even in Canada and Japan, people are bringing their dogs to these special yoga classes. Each class is comprised of yoga stretches for humans, who use their dog as extra weight or to stretch over/around, as well as stretches and massages for the dogs. The class is aimed at bringing dogs and their people together, as a way to spend time with one another doing something beneficial for both of their minds and bodies.

Of course, my first thought when I read about doga was "Psh, my dog would NEVER do that!" He gets too excited around new people and especially around other dogs. I just can't imagine him calming down enough for me to get a handle on him to do something soothing. It's been said, though, that even dogs who seem too worked up at the beginning usually calm down after doga class begins. They become relaxed as you rub and stretch them.

If you are interested in trying Doga you can Google around for a place near you, as there doesn't yet seem to be a specific site dedicated to helping the search for doga classes in particular areas. Otherwise, Suzi Teitelman and her dog Coali are releasing the first doga video later this year.

Now, I know that not all dogs are like mine, so I can see how doga could be beneficial to some dogs and their owners. Personally, I am not into yoga so maybe that's why this doesn't have any special pull for me. But if yoga is your thing and you've got a special dog in your life, maybe this is a really cool way to bring two things you love together.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Introducing Sappho



Initially I was going to keep this blog about Animal Issues, and leave my personal life out of it other than my opinions on said Animal Issues. Then I started writing, and my God is this thing depressing! So much sadness, so much cruelty, always an uphill battle.

But it's not like that for every animal, thankfully. I have three of my own - two cats and a dog - and when I stumbled upon this little gem of a photo, I knew I just had to share it.

This is my cat, Sappho. She's the baby of our family and she's soft and shy and dainty. She rarely comes out from under our bed if we have company over but sometimes she'll surprise us and make an appearance. Until the dog chases her back to her hiding place, loving big brother that he is.

This is Sappho doing what we call "The Bear." I mean...don't you see it? She never fights or struggles when we hold her front arms up this way, even when she knows it's coming, but she always gives us this surly look.

Another funny thing about Sappho is her misunderstanding of the whole covered litterbox idea. She goes in, keeping her front paws and head outside the box, does her business and then proceeds to scrape at the outside of the box - which covers nothing - and hops out, prouder than if she'd used the toilet.

My husband calls her defective, but I think maybe she's just stinking up the place to get back at us for making her do The Bear. And I don't blame her for jumping from the litterbox right into his lap.

Petition: Sign "Koda's Law" into Effect!


In Michigan shelter animals are allowed to be bought for research. The animals are then euthanized.

Michigan House Bill 4663 is referred to as "Koda's Law" because a dog named Koda was surrendered by his family to a shelter in Michigan, where they believed he would have a chance at finding a forever home. Instead, he was sold for research to a USDA Class B Dealer and resold to the University of Michigan. Koda was used in the University's Advanced Trauma Life Support class before being euthanized.

The bottom line here is that a vital trust is being broken. People who surrender their animals, or even animals they find as strays, bring them to shelters because they believe the animals will be cared for and adopted into loving homes. The greater trust being violated is that of the animals themselves. They depend on humans for protection and the very people they grow to trust are turning them over to be used and killed. This is horribly wrong.

Koda's Law will not prohibit legitimate medical research. It will merely prevent shelter animals from being bought and sold for research purposes, giving the people who need to give up their pets the peace of mind that the animal will have a second chance, and giving the pets the opportunity to finding a loving home.

Please join me in signing this petition & pass it on to as many people as you can.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Michael Vick Trying to Claim Bankruptcy


As I'm sure you've heard by now, former Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick plead guilty to charges of felony dog fighting in April 2007. Now the former NFL star is trying to file for Chapter 11 - without much success.

Judge Frank Santoro ordered Vick to come up with a different plan than the one he presented on April 3, saying that the $750,000 to $1 million dollars his current plan called for him paying to creditors right off the bat was impossible.

Vick is attempting to financially support his mother, brother (who's also been convicted of criminal charges and is out on a suspended sentence), fiancée, and his two children, in addition to some friends. Judge Santoro advised Vick to stop trying to be "everything to everybody." The judge also suggested that Vick sell one or both of his multi-million dollar homes in Virginia, or any of the three cars he still owns, all of which he intended to keep as part of this plan. Quality advice for someone who doesn't seem to make very good choices for himself.

Also, Judge Santoro ruled that the bankruptcy plan leaned too heavily on the prospect of Vick returning to a high-paying position with the NFL, of which there is certainly no guarantee after his 2007 suspension without pay. Falcons owner Arthur Blank sued Vick for $20 million of his $37 million signing bonus, stating that at the time of the agreement Vick knew he was involved in illegal activity that was a breach of his contract. Vick was ordered to repay $19.97 million to the Falcons, one of the many debts he now owes various people and organizations. If he is welcomed back into the NFL, it's almost certain that Vick will not be going back as a Falcon.

I sincerely hope that Michael Vick is not allowed to play professional football ever again. I think he's already proven himself to be unworthy of the role-model status that comes with athletic stardom, as well as undeserving of fame and fortune. Not to mention the fact that there are dogs who will never fully recover from the horror they experienced at Vick's hand and thus can never be adopted into loving homes. Courts ruled that some of the Vick dogs never be available for adoption, so they will spend their lives in animal rescues (including my fav, Best Friends!) receiving one-on-one help with their emotional and behavioral problems.

After all his apologies, Vick was remanded to jail when he was out on bail awaiting trial in September 2007 for failing a random drug test: there was marijuana in his system. This does not speak to someone who is sorry for their crimes. Rather, is tells me that Michael Vick can say what he thinks people want to hear, what will get him out of trouble. Then it's right back to doing whatever he wants because he's a narcissistic asshole. I'm not saying that I think smoking pot makes you a bad person. I just think that when you're in such deep trouble you should be doing everything in your power to keep yourself afloat. The series of selfish decisions made by Vick makes me doubt his claims of reform and repentance.

I feel no sympathy for this man. I have lots of sympathy for his dogs, though, and lots of admiration for the amazing people who are helping them every day.

There was a great article published in the December 2008 edition of Sports Illustrated magazine called What happened to Michael Vick's dogs... by Jim Gorant. In it we learn that:
"In the end, 47 of the 51 Vick dogs were saved. (Two died while in the shelters; one was destroyed because it was too violent; and another was euthanized for medical reasons.) Twenty-two dogs went to Best Friends Animal Sanctuary where McMillan and his staff chart their emotional state daily; almost all show steady improvement in categories such as calmness, sociability and happiness. McMillan believes 17 of the dogs will eventually be adopted, and applicants are being screened for the first of those. The other 25 have been spread around the country; the biggest group, 10, went to California with BAD RAP. Fourteen of the 25 have been placed in permanent homes, and the rest are in foster care."

Best Friends publishes frequent updates about their 22 "Vicktory" Dogs and BAD RAP has a Vick Dog Blog with updates on the dogs who ended up with them. These dogs are all making remarkable progress toward recovery.

Let's hope Michael Vick isn't offered the financial resources and opportunity to set up another dogfighting ring and destroy more innocent lives. The next round might not be so lucky.

Go Orange for Animals!


April marks the the anniversary of the signing of the ASPCA's charter in 1866. In celebration they've started the "Go Orange for Animals" campaign as a way to raise awareness about animal cruelty, which kicks off tomorrow, April 7.

During the month of April there are fund raisers, cruelty prevention walks, bake sales, and buildings lighting up in orange to celebrate the prevention of animal cruelty in our society. There are buildings all over the U.S. going orange, including two from my town, Chicago: One South Dearborn & the Wrigley Building.

Here are a few ways you can Go Orange on your own. Happy Animal Cruelty Prevention Month!

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Give a (Stuffed) Rabbit for Easter


For those who celebrate Easter, and for those of you who don't but are overwhelmed by Easter paraphernalia beginning February 15th anyway, you've probably noticed the increased supply of real bunnies around this time. Pet stores gear up for the impulsive parents who think that getting their kid a real, live bunny for Easter is a great idea - without doing any research on what it actually means to care for a pet rabbit. Every year after Easter, rescues all over the country experience a significant swell in rabbits being surrendered by folks who can't or won't take care of them anymore. This year, though, there's a great alternative to consider.

Drum roll, please....

Ta-da! You can adopt a stuffed rabbit!

Best Friends Animal Sanctuary, the world's leader in animal rescue and a champion of animal rights, has teamed up with StuffedAdoption.com to bring you these stuffed rabbits who represent real rabbits in shelters across America. Each bunny comes with a story and some personality background, and they range in price from $12-$20 - pretty affordable! Best of all, a portion of the proceeds from each bunny sold will go to Best Friends' renovations of Bunny House, the rabbit portion of their sanctuary. Or maybe best of all is that you won't end up with chewed cables & wires all over your house.

By opting for the stuffed bunny, it also gives you a great opportunity to talk with your kid(s) about animal rescue and to stress the importance of making sure you are ready to take on responsibility for another life before adopting a real pet. Not to mention that it's easier to take a stuffed bunny to show-and-tell than the live version anyway.

Silly Walrus!


Thought I'd share this since it makes me laugh every time I look at it.
Thanks, Meredith!

Pets With Allergies

I've suspected for years that my cat, Shep, is allergic to fleas. When he was around two I noticed that the hair above his tail was beginning to fall out and he seemed itchier than the other cats we'd had. Now, at 12 years old, it's a cycle: his hair grows back in tufts in the winter, then as soon as the warm weather hits he's sporting a bald patch on his backside.

What I didn't suspect was how common animal allergies are.

A CNN article reports that about 10% of dogs have allergies. Unfortunately, there's not enough data on cats to make a determination about percentages who suffer from allergies, though we know that cat allergies do exist.

A common allergy in pets is to flea saliva. Dogs and cats can also have environmental allergies just like humans, to pollen and grass and mold, as well as to other environmental factors. Often allergies manifest themselves as vigorous itching,but they can also experience wheezing, coughing, runny nose, sneezing, or itchy, watery eyes, depending on the allergen or antigen.

What can you do for a pet with allergies?

There is currently no cure for allergies in humans or animals. In general, allergies are best managed by avoiding the allergen whenever possible. If your pet - or you! - has indoor allergies (such as to dust), vacuuming more often is a big help. Avoiding too much time outdoors if one of you is allergic to pollen or grass is a good strategy. Following a strict flea control plan is recommended for any pet, of course, and frequent baths help with skin irritation regardless of the allergen.

Contact your veterinarian if you suspect your pet has allergies. Depending on the severity they may be able to come up with a specific plan tailored to your pet's needs that will help lessen the symptoms of your pet's reactions and make him or her more comfortable.

For Shep, we are religious about his monthly dose of flea medication as the vet suggested, but there is no way he would ever go near a bath. The flea meds seem to help for the most part, as I no longer catch him trying to scratch off his behind. He doesn't seem to mind being partially bald for 8 months out of the year. In fact, he hardly even notices.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Elke the Francois' Leaf Monkey




Rejected by her mother, Elke is a 16-day-old female Francois' Langur, or Francois' Leaf Monkey, being hand-raised by caretakers at the Taronga Zoo in Sydney, Australia. Native to China and Vietnam, there is thought to be as little as 1,000 of these primates left in the wild, so the birth of this little gal is pretty special. I came across Elke's story when a couple of my friends sent me a short YouTube video of her looking adorable as she is seen publicly for the first time at four days old. You should take a minute and check out the video so you can be overwhelmed by cuteness, too.

Eat (Too Much) Meat?

Going vegetarian is a concept I've been toying with recently. Of course, I love a good steak and who doesn't crave the occasional cheeseburger? Not to mention that chicken is pretty much my main source of protein and spaghetti just isn't the same without ground beef. And what about all the hype about vegetarians not getting enough protein in their diet?

In doing some research on the vegetarian lifestyle, I've come to really admire Huffington Post contributor and self-help author Kathy Freston. A seasoned vegan, Freston writes about the positive aspects of going vegetarian and vegan: for your health, for the environment, and as a way to end animal cruelty. Today, I came across this article on HuffPost, which I am going to shamelessly copy-and-paste here to make sure everyone reads it:

The Breathtaking Effects of Cutting Back on Meat

Kathy Freston on The Huffington Post

I've written extensively on the consequences of eating meat - on our health, our sense of "right living", and on the environment. It is one of those daily practices that has such a broad and deep effect that I think it merits looking at over and over again, from all the different perspectives. Sometimes, solutions to the world's biggest problems are right in front of us. The following statistics are eye-opening, to say the least.

If everyone went vegetarian just for one day, the U.S. would save:

● 100 billion gallons of water, enough to supply all the homes in New England for almost 4 months;

● 1.5 billion pounds of crops otherwise fed to livestock, enough to feed the state of New Mexico for more than a year;

● 70 million gallons of gas--enough to fuel all the cars of Canada and Mexico combined with plenty to spare;

● 3 million acres of land, an area more than twice the size of Delaware;

● 33 tons of antibiotics.

If everyone went vegetarian just for one day, the U.S. would prevent:

● Greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to 1.2 million tons of CO2, as much as produced by all of France;

● 3 million tons of soil erosion and $70 million in resulting economic damages;

● 4.5 million tons of animal excrement;

● Almost 7 tons of ammonia emissions, a major air pollutant.

My favorite statistic is this: According to Environmental Defense, if every American skipped one meal of chicken per week and substituted vegetarian foods instead, the carbon dioxide savings would be the same as taking more than half a million cars off of U.S. roads. See how easy it is to make an impact?

Other points:

Globally, we feed 756 million tons of grain to farmed animals. As Princeton bioethicist Peter Singer notes in his new book, if we fed that grain to the 1.4 billion people who are living in abject poverty, each of them would be provided more than half a ton of grain, or about 3 pounds of grain/day--that's twice the grain they would need to survive. And that doesn't even include the 225 million tons of soy that are produced every year, almost all of which is fed to farmed animals. He writes, "The world is not running out of food. The problem is that we--the relatively affluent--have found a way to consume four or five times as much food as would be possible, if we were to eat the crops we grow directly."

A recent United Nations report titled Livestock's Long Shadow concluded that the meat industry causes almost 40% more greenhouse gas emissions than all the world's transportation systems--that's all the cars, trucks, SUVs, planes and ships in the world combined. The report also concluded that factory farming is one of the biggest contributors to the most serious environmental problems at every level--local and global.

Researchers at the University of Chicago concluded that switching from standard American diet to a vegan diet is more effective in the fight against global warming than switching from a standard American car to a hybrid.

In its report, the U.N. found that the meat industry causes local and global environmental problems even beyond global warming. It said that the meat industry should be a main focus in every discussion of land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortages and pollution, and loss of biodiversity.

Unattributed statistics were calculated from scientific reports by Noam Mohr, a physicist with the New York University Polytechnic Institute.

*********
I think there are some really powerful statistics presented in Freston's article that prove how much good going vegetarian or vegan can do.

I struggle with my conscience over the hypocrisy I feel about eating meat, all the while proclaiming myself an animal lover/defender. The animals bred and killed for food often suffer truly horrible lives before they are brutally killed. That is before even taking into consideration the cost of being a vegetarian while my husband continues to eat meat. Buying two sets of ingredients for every meal just doesn't work into our budget. Things are tight enough where buying ingredients for one meal that isn't spaghetti can be tricky.

What strikes me about Freston's statistics is that she includes ways to make a difference by just taking meat out of your diet for one day, or even one meal. This compromise seems ideal for me while we struggle to make ends meet (ha ha, pun intended).

I think the most powerful change we can hope to see in improving our health, environment, and treatment of our animals will happen when everyone takes on a little bit of responsibility for a positive outcome. Though I cannot feasibly stop eating meat at the moment, I can most certainly opt to have one day a week where I focus my eating habits elsewhere. And that makes me feel like I'm doing my part to shoulder some of the burden for these issues.